The NY Times calls Pakistan's involvement in the war on terror "a double-edged sword" (registration required). Noting the involvement of the July 7 bombers with Pakistan, and the gratitude expressed by Blair for the assistance extended by the Pakistani authorities in foiling the recent air terror threat, the article concludes that -
"But for Pakistan, success of this kind is a double-edged word. It allows Pakistan’s president, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, to exhibit the country’s importance as a front-line ally in the global war against terror. But it is also a tacit acknowledgment of what a nexus Pakistan remains for would-be terrorists from halfway across the world."
Questioning whether the failure to combat terror operations from its soil is an intentional failure on the part of Pakistan, the article notes that -
"Still, Pakistani officials say they have been reliable allies against terrorism. It is impossible, they say, to keep tabs on everyone operating in difficult terrain in a country twice the size of California. “So there are maybe 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, or 500 people like this — we don’t know,” said a senior Pakistani official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly. “Whenever we get information like that, we do get hold of them.”"
There's some more about the exact links some recently apprehended terror suspects had with Pakistan, and how terrorists slip easily into Afghanistan from Pakistan. All in all it's not an earth-shatteringly revelatory piece, but a good place for someone unfamiliar with the issue to get an update on Pakistan's role in the war on terror.
A blog for discussions on media, political and cultural issues of South Asian and international significance
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
- April (1)
- March (1)
- September (1)
- June (2)
- May (1)
- April (2)
- March (3)
- February (2)
- January (1)
- December (1)
- November (4)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- May (1)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (1)
- November (1)
- October (1)
- March (2)
- December (1)
- September (2)
- August (1)
- July (1)
- June (2)
- May (3)
- April (2)
- March (2)
- February (2)
- December (1)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (6)
- July (2)
- May (2)
- April (1)
- March (1)
- February (2)
1 comment:
Hmm!! What's your view on the Bugti issue?
Post a Comment